
Project study tours
The deliverable is agreed first. Every visit, interview and free afternoon then has to earn its place by moving the group closer to it.
CAS trips planned so the strands are genuinely met and the evidence writes itself.
CAS goes wrong in a predictable way: a week of activity, then a scramble to retrofit reflections onto it. We plan the other way round. The learning outcomes are mapped to the days before the trip is booked, so what a student writes afterwards is a description rather than an invention.
Service is the strand most often faked, so it gets the most attention here. We work with a host organisation that has a real task and a real timeline, we agree what the group can actually contribute in the days available, and we do not describe a morning of photographs as service.
Four things this programme is designed to leave behind. If it cannot deliver them, it is the wrong programme and we say so.



A shape, not a schedule. Yours is built around your dates, your year group and what the trip has to achieve.
Length, region and season are set against your academic calendar and your budget. No prices are published because a school group is costed against its own headcount, dates and inclusions, never against a brochure rate.
Every programme on this site runs to the same written protocol. It is published in full, because a teacher who is personally accountable should not have to take it on trust.
Two minutes to send, and a coordinator calls the school back. No prices are quoted until we know the headcount, the dates and what the trip has to achieve.
Also on WhatsApp.